Specific Purpose – To persuade my audience that animal testing is wrong and how other safer alternatives should be taken. Central Idea – By going the extra mile in using safer alternatives when experimenting with animals will not only prevent conflicts from pro-life activists, it will minimize lawsuits and morals will be preserved. Introduction I. Okay I got a riddle I made up for the class. A. What was once cute and furry but becomes a bloody rotted mess? B. You guys give up? C. Well the answer to this question is an animal that has undergone chemical testing. II....
American Anti-Vivisection Society states, "The more than 90 percent of animals used in laboratories who currently have no legal protection could now be covered by federal law."

Conclusion I. On a closing note, I would just like to re-mention that alternatives have already been taken to prevent animals from being subjected to the cruelties of scientific research. II. I merely wanted to reinforce the idea on how most vivisection problems are now solved, and should stay solved. III. After all, if you were a guinea pig or albino rat, would you like to be tested upon by dangerous chemicals?