What can roman satire tell us about them?
0 User(s) Rated!
0 User(s) Rated! Words: 3162 Views: 89 Comments: 0
Satire can be crude, but we don't have to read it crudely. Before we turn on Satire or let it turn on us, before we gorge ourselves on the lanx satura of delinquents, gluttons, womanisers, social climbers, parasites and the like, let us step outside, if we can, and look at the bigger picture of literature and its relation to/relationship with cultural identity. It is easy, far too temptingly easy, to read a text straight. To cull a few quotes about whichever cultural area we happen to be interested in - 'women' or 'religion' or 'foreigners,' for example,...
have looked at the multiplicity of meanings and suggestions of one small phrase, and understood how this polysemy makes straight reading impossible. We have seen how satire is crucially bound up with creating and wrestling with structures of power, and how the performative aspect of language can work as a part of that discourse of power. Satire is not simple, and nor is the question of cultural identity. It should have become clear by now, that whatever satire tells Us, whoever we are, about Them, whoever they are, it isn't something that can be explicitly or straightforwardly said.
have looked at the multiplicity of meanings and suggestions of one small phrase, and understood how this polysemy makes straight reading impossible. We have seen how satire is crucially bound up with creating and wrestling with structures of power, and how the performative aspect of language can work as a part of that discourse of power. Satire is not simple, and nor is the question of cultural identity. It should have become clear by now, that whatever satire tells Us, whoever we are, about Them, whoever they are, it isn't something that can be explicitly or straightforwardly said.
It is impossible, and undesirable, to separate war in and between ancient Greek poleis from their economies or from their societies, or to separate their economies and societies from each other. Nor is it helpful to consider 'war' as a freestanding factor that can be added, like an ingredient...
Words: 5060 View(s): 71 Comment(s): 0
In scene 441ff Sophocles stages two opposed portraits: Creon regal and authoritative in his kingly robe, staff in hand, a male standing against the background of the city, whilst Antigone bows her head, hair ripped and mourning dress torn, a woman surrounded by the home and family. It is...
Words: 3765 View(s): 86 Comment(s): 0
Before I begin discussing Aristotle"s account of virtue in the second book of the " Ethics", it must be understood that I am pre-supposing a knowledge of the first book of this philosophical work, and Aristotle"s discussion of happiness being the best possible good for man, and his conclusion that...
Words: 3657 View(s): 244 Comment(s): 0
The title mentions choice. It is important to realise that in describing a scene, writers are not merely mechanical mouthpieces for untidy reality. Conscious or not, their choice of what to include in the picture they paint feeds the reader a highly stylised representation of reality. Or rather, a...
Words: 5057 View(s): 90 Comment(s): 0
In Nicomachean Ethics book VII, Aristotle presents us with a discussion on the states of character. A major part of this is his theory of acrasia, which translates into English imperfectly as something like weak-will or incontinence. Aristotle's theory of acrasia goes against the view that no one knowingly...
Words: 2309 View(s): 94 Comment(s): 0






