Related Keywords

No Related Keywords

Register NowHow It Works Need Essay Need Essay
Rate of Reaction - Sodium Thiosulphate and Hydrochloric Acid
0 User(s) Rated!
Words: 2794 Views: 515 Comments: 0
?Aim??Investigation, to find out how the rate of reaction between Sodium?Thiosulphate and Hydrochloric acid is affected by changing the?concentration.??Introduction??I must produce a piece of coursework investigating the rate of?reaction, and the effect different changes have on them. The rate of?reaction is the rate of loss of a reactant or the rate of development?of a product during a chemical reaction. It is measured by dividing 1?by the time taken for the reaction to take place. There is five?factors which affect the rate of a reaction, according to the?collision theory of reacting particles: temperature, concentration of?solution, pressure in gases, surface area of...
due to?time restrictions.??· I used ICT to display my coursework, but I did not use it in anyway?that affected the experiment.??· I would like to do a further experiment to confirm my results.?However I am restricted by time and the available facilities which?means I cannot repeat it.??· Also instead of using a cross on a piece of paper I could use a?single beam of light until it could no longer be seen??· Use of computer to aid analysis of results??· Carry out all of the experiments on same day to improve accuracy??· Calculate more than ten tangents to improve accuracy?
Become A Member Become a member to continue reading this essay orLoginLogin
View Comments Add Comment

Prediction I predict that the...Prediction I predict that the lower the concentration of the hydrochloric acid so there is fewer particles per cm3, the slower the rate of reaction will be. This is because there will be fewer particles in the Hydrochloric acid per cm3, and the solution will be more dilute so less successful collisions will be made due to fewer particles to react with each other. So I think if the Hydrochloric acid is very strong with no water to dilute the substance the cross on the paper will disappear the quickest as I think the most amount of sulpher will be created in the reaction. I think this will happen because there are more of the hydrochloric acids particles per cm3 so the chance of a successful reaction with a hydrochloric particle and a sodium thiosulfate particle is higher so the rate of reaction is faster which causes more sulphur to be given off. But if less reactions take place the rate of reaction will be slower so I think less sulphur will be given off because of this. Here is a Picture showing what I think will happen in a high concentration of sodium thiosulfate and also in a lower concentration. This is called the collision theory. I found these diagrams when I researched about rates of reaction I think reactions will happen faster due to the collision theory. This is where if two particles collide with each other with enough force a reaction takes place. So if there is more of the Hydrochloric acid more reactions take place as the chances of a head on collision which causes a reaction to take place is greater as there is more Hydrochloric acid per cm3 I also think that the reaction will happen in direct proportion. So if the amount of Hydrochloric acid is halved the amount of reactions will also half. I don't have any research to back this up but I think this will happen as it is logical. I also think this will happen because if the amount of Hydrochloric acid is doubled there is going to be double more Hydrochloric acid particles than what was in the solution before so in theory the time it takes for the cross to disappear should be halved and happen double as quick as the time before Here is a prediction graph of what I think is going to happen Method I am going to investigate how different concentrations of Hydrochloric acid and water affect the rate of reaction. As I have chosen to use different concentrations I am going to vary the amount of Hydrochloric acid in the solution. But to keep it a fair test and for the experiment to work I must keep the total volume the same. I am going to have the total volume 40 cm3. To make the experiment a fair test I will always have 20 cm3 of sodium thiosulfate. But I must always have 40 cm3 in the solution so if I have the Hydrochloric acid quite dilute at 10 cm3 I must have 10 cm3 of water to keep the experiment fair to make the total volume all the same. To also keep it a fair test I will also have to keep other variables the same. This is the temperature. To keep this fair I will do the experiment all in one room so there is no difference in temperature and away from windows so the sun can not affect my experiment. This along with always keeping the volume the same will make my experiment a fair test. In my experiment I am going to see how long it takes for different solutions of Hydrochloric acid to produce enough sulphur until a cross on a piece of paper disappears. I will explain how this works now. What I will be doing First of all I will get all of my apparatus which is listed below. I will then set up my experiment. To start this I will put a piece of paper with a thick cross done in pen underneath a beaker. This is what will tell me what the rate of reaction is like. Because if the cross disappears quickly the rate of reaction is high and lots of sulphur is given off because of this as more particles are reacting quicker. But if the rate of reaction is slower it will take longer for the sulphur to cover the cross so it could not be seen. This would mean less reactions were taking place and slower because not as much sulphur is being formed. So that is what I will use the cross for. I am going to keep the level of sodium thiosulfate the same in my experiment and every time at 20 cm3. So in a small measuring cylinder so I can measure the amount more accurately I will use a pippet and measure 20 cm3 into the measuring cylinder. I will then pour this amount into the beaker. After this in a new measuring cylinder so I don't get the two substances contaminated I will measure out the first amount of the hydrochloric acid which I will be using. I will be using the following amounts watercm3 hydrochloric acidcm3 0 20 5 15 All add up to 20cm3 10 10 15 5 17 3* *The last set I had to change as if I had it all water a reaction could not have taken place which was just realized because there would be no particles from hydrochloric acid to react and to cause a reaction. So if I was using 15 cm3 of hydrochloric acid I would measure this amount into a measuring cylinder using a pippet. I would also need 5 cm3 to make the whole solution up to 20 cm3. After adding the 5cm3 of water into the same measuring cylinder I would then add this is to the beaker with the sodium thiosulfate in. Once this is poured in I will use a stopwatch and wait, without stirring or touching the beaker or the solution. I will time how long it takes for the sulpher to fully make the cross on the piece of paper disappear. I will then stop the stopwatch when the cross has disappeared and write down the results in a table. I will then repeat the same procedure with different amounts of hydrochloric acid and water which are shown above. But on each of the different amounts 20cm3 of sodium thiosulfate will always be used. This will make every concentration I try 40cm3. This will help to make it a fair test. I am going to repeat each amount of hydrochloric acid and water 3 times. This will help make my experiment a fair test as I can then take averages and taken 3 results will show any abnormities which I could then repeat ,to try and get a better set of results. In the results table I will have to convert the times into seconds so I can work out averages. Here is a picture of the apparatus set up:- List of equipment Measuring cylinders Pippet Stop watch Beaker Paper cross Hydrochloric acid Sodium thiosulfate Water After finding all of my results for each concentration and making averages I could do a calculation to find the rate of reaction. . This calculation would give me the rate of reaction, which is measured in how many reactions there are per second as the more collisions of particles per second the faster the reaction will be and so the higher the number. To find this out I will first need to take averages from each concentration. After this I would take this number and divide it by 1. This will give me a very small number but will probably come up on my calculator with like 8.8454 with -03 at the top at the end of the number. I would have to change this to standard form. This would be done by moving the decimal place backwards 3 places as it is negative and replacing the digits behind with zeros. So the number would become 0.0088 Here is a example:- say a average is 127 seconds for the cross to disappear. So 1 divided by 127 is 7.8740 -03 so moving the decimal point back 3 spaces the number would become 0.0078. This would be the rate of reaction Water Hydrochloric Acid cm3 Sodium Thiosulphate cm3 Volume cm3 Seconds Time 1 Time 2 Time 3 avr RoR 0 20 20 40 115 113 109 112 0.0089 5 15 20 40 123 125 118 122 0.0082 10 10 20 40 138 135 137 137 0.0073 15 5 20 40 157 161 163-152* 157 0.0064 17 3 20 40 210 218 200 209 0.0048 results * With this result I think I had a abnormity so I decided to retake that result and I came out with 152 seconds which was more like what I had been looking for. I used this result to work out the average. Analysis From my results I have drawn 2 graphs from the results I have collated. In the first graph it shows the rate of reaction and also the concentrations of hydrochloric acid and water. The graph shows that at fully concentrated hydrochloric acid with no water the rate of reaction which happens with the amount of reactions per second that the most happen with 0.0089. At a quite strong concentration of 15 cm3 hydrochloric acid and 5 cm3 water the rate of reaction was also quite high but not as high as the highest concentration. This amount was 0.0082. From this amount it goes down to 0.0073 at a concentration of 10 cm3 acid and 10cm3 water. The next point is then at 0.0064 at 5 cm3 acid and 15 cm3 water. These 4 points go in a very steady line which is quite steep. This shows that the part in my prediction where I said I thought the results would go down in direct proportion is right. But after the 4th point the line on the graph gets even steeper going downwards. I think this is because we made a mistake with what concentrations to use so we used 3cm3 acid and 17 cm3 water so the concentration was a lot weaker than the others. I believe if we had started at 25cm3 hydrochloric acid and nothing of water and then 20cm3 acid and 5cm3 water all of the results would have continued the steady quite steep directly proportional line. ON this graph it also shows that as the concentration decreases of hydrochloric acid the rate of reaction in the solution falls. This is shown from the highest concentration of hydrochloric acid where the rate of reaction of successful collisions in one second was a high value of 0.0089 and at the lowest concentration it was 0.0048 showing the difference in the amount of successful collisions. On the second graph it shows how the change in concentration affects how long it took for the sulphur produced from the experiment to cover the cross so it could no longer be seen. The averages f the concentrations shows a gradual curved line starting at the lowest time for the cross to disappear at the highest concentration which took 113 seconds to the longest time at 210 seconds at the weakest concentration of acid. The graph goes up in a curve from the highest concentration to the weakest concentration. This shows that as the concentration of the hydrochloric acid increases the time it takes for the cross to disappear decreases. I think that it takes less time in higher concentrations for the sulphur to make the cross disappear and the rate of reaction goes up is because of the amounts of particles in the hydrochloric acid. I think that the rate of reaction is higher in the more concentration solutions because there are more hydrochloric acid particles in the solution per cubic centimetre. This means there is a higher chance of those particles colliding with a sodium thiosulphate particle and there being a successful collision because there are more of them. This is backed up with scientific research which I took from a chemistry book "The more concentrated acid has more acid particles per cubic centimetre so these particles will collide with the substance more often causing a reaction to take place if the collision is strong enough" This and my graphs back this up and also what I said in my prediction. I also think more sulphur is produced quicker with higher concentrations because of the collision theory. Because there are more successful reactions per second in higher concentrations due to increased hydrochloric acid particles per cm3 so more sulphur is produced as a waste gas after the reactions take place. So if there are more reactions per second the sulphur is given off more quickly due to this. This is why the sulphur makes the cross disappear more quickly with higher concentrations of acid and why there are more reactions per second with higher concentrations of acid. Here is a equation for the reaction:- HCl + sodium thiosulfate sodium chloride + sulfur dioxide + sulfur + water HClaq + Na2S2O3aq NaClaq + SO2g + Ss + H2Ol This reaction shows the hydrochloric acid and sodium thiosulfate reacting together to produce the other products of sodium chloride + sulfur dioxide + sulfur + water. This is where the sulphur comes from. Evaluation I think my experiment went well and there were good points to it and also bad points. The good points "“ I think I did well to keep all the variables the same except for the concentration, but only on the first day of the experiment. I managed to not let temperature affect the investigation by doing it in the centre of the room to avoid the sunlight. I also kept the beaker absolutely still whilst doing the experiment so I did not affect any other variables. I also think I did well when measuring amounts. For the lower concentrations I used small measuring cylinders so I could be more accurate on how much of the substance was in it. This was also useful when measuring the amount of water. Apart from these good things I feel the experiment could be done a lot better. The first major problem with how I did this experiment was that even though I kept all the other variables the same I took some results on a different day which unsettled my results. The first two results of each concentration were taken on the first day of the experiment and I was getting balanced results with 115 seconds and 113 seconds for the biggest concentration of the acid. But on the third attempt on the same concentration done on another day the time for the cross to disappear was less with 109 seconds. This was the same for all the results I took on the 2nd experiment day. I think the temperature affected the results and it was hotter on the 2nd day to speed up the reaction and act as a catalyst. I could not help this but if I did the experiment again I would try to get it all done on one day so different temperatures on different days could not affect the experiment. If I took all the results on one day it would make the experiment a lot fairer as natural weather effects over different days could not affect my experiment if it was all done on one day. But even with doing the experiment over two days my results kept mostly within 10% with each other. I worked this out by taking the biggest difference over three values of a given concentration and dividing the difference from the biggest and the smallest, so if I had 3 results of 123,127 and 125 the biggest difference is 4. This is then divided by the biggest number which is 127 and multiplied by 100 to turn it into a percentage. So the calculation would be 4/127 multiplied by 100 I don't think I had some within 10% of each other because the experiment was carried out on two different days. I think if the test had been carried out all on one day the results would be a lot more accurate. Another bad thing I thought about the experiment was having to use the naked eye to tell when the cross had fully disappeared. Sometimes I could not tell if the cross had fully disappeared as I could see little glimpses of it. This could affect timings by considerable amounts as I never really new when the cross had fully disappeared. I think this was a major problem with the experiment and how it was carried out. Another thing that added to this problem was that I used two different crosses on the different days, again showing how it should really be carried out on just one day to make it a fair test. If I was to do the experiment again with the same method I would make sure to use just one cross and stick to it. But I think there is another method available if I was to do this experiment again. I could use a realistic computer simulation. On this program it would allow me to change many variables mainly concentration and temperature. Either can be easily adjusted and is very simple to use. I think this would be a very good idea because it would completely be a fair test and no variables other than the one you want can affect it as it is a simulation. On the screen the variable can be changed and on the screen it shows how many reactions there have been. The data given after the experiment has been completed can then be easily put onto graphs and analysed. I think this would be a much better method as it would get rid of the slightly inaccurate method of seeing how long it takes for the sulphur to completely cover the cross. With the simulation it would get rid of all these hassles and I think the results would be a lot more accurate because all the other variables can be kept exactly the same as it is a simulation on the computer. Overall I think the experiment went quite well but the problems with doing the experiment on different days and using different crosses didn't make the experiment that viable or that fair. But even with these problems my results were quite accurate and reliable but I feel could have been made better by preferably using a computer simulation which would be very reliable and accurate   

Prediction I predict that the lower the concentration of the hydrochloric acid so there is fewer particles per cm3, the slower the rate of reaction will be. This is because there will be fewer particles in the Hydrochloric acid per cm3, and the solution will be more dilute so...

Words: 3220 View(s): 228 Comment(s): 0
Aim: To investigate... Aim: To investigate the rate of reaction between Hydrochloric acid and marble chips. Background Knowledge: Factors that affect the rate of reaction between hydrochloric acid and marble chips or any other reaction are called variables. They are: ¨ The surface area of the chips Solids with a large surface area react faster than solids with a smaller surface area. This is due to the fact that if there is more area on the solid to react with the substance the reaction is able to occur much faster. Page 79 "“ GCSE Chemistry revision Guide This diagram shows a large particle small surface area and lots of small particles large surface area and how the particles can react with more area on the smaller pieces. ¨ The temperature of the acid The more heat particles have, the more energy they have. So if the particles have more energy they're going to move around faster. As they're moving around faster, there's more chance of collisions. So the higher temperature increases collisions therefore speeds up the reaction. Page 79 "“ GCSE Chemistry revision Guide This diagram shows the difference in movement between hot and cold particles. ¨ The concentration of the acid As the concentration increases, the rate of reaction increases. This, like the temperature of the acid, is based on the collision theory. The higher the concentration, the more particles therefore the more collisions so the reaction takes place faster. Page 79 "“ GCSE Chemistry revision Guide This diagram shows the movement and difference between a low concentration of particles and a high concentration of particles. ¨ Catalysts A catalyst speeds up a reaction. It does this by lowering the activation energy. The activation energy is what is needed to turn reactants marble chips into products hydrogen gas. To make reactants turn into products a sufficient amount of energy is needed to make the particles collide to start the reaction. This is activation energy and it gives an exothermic reaction the energy it needs to continue the reaction. Catalysts lower the activation energy so it is easier for particles to react so a lot more particles have enough energy to react, therefore, speeding up the rate of reaction. Page 79 "“ GCSE Chemistry revision Guide This diagram shows how a catalyst gives particles something to stick to, increasing the number of collisions. Page 80 "“ GCSE Chemistry revision Guide This graph shows the effect of a catalyst on the rate of reaction. The factors that affect the rate of reaction are all based on the collision theory. The theory that all particles have to collide to cause a reaction. Preliminary work: To investigate the different concentrations of the acid would be the easiest to measure conducted over a short period of time and satisfactory results would be produced. To measure the rate of reaction, the amount of gas given off could be measured. From the equation: CaCO3 + 2HCL à CaCL2 + H20 + CO2 It is seen that a gas is produced, CO2 so the amount of gas that is produced at different concentrations could be measured. A mole calculation was used to find out how much Calcium Carbonate to use. If I use a 100cm3 measuring cylinder to measure gas: 24000cm3 of gas is 1 mole of gas 100/24000 = 1/240 = 4.2 x 10-3 moles CaCO3 : CO2 1 : 1 1 mole : 1 mole 100g : 44g 4.2 x 10-3 m : 4.2 x 10-3 m 4.2 x 10-3 m x 100g = 0.42g 0.42g of calcium carbonate should produce 100cm3 of gas. Therefore, the minimum of calcium carbonate I will use to get sufficient results is 0.5g. I will be using five different concentrations of acid: 100%, 75%, 50%, 25% and 0%. So the amount I will use will be: 100% = 20cm3 HCL 0cm3 Water 75% = 15cm3 HCL 5cm3 Water 50% = 10cm3 HCL 10cm3 Water 25% = 5cm3 HCL 15cm3 Water 0% = 0cm3 HCL 20cm3 Water This is used as a control A 0% concentration will be used as a control to see if calcium carbonate would react with water or not. This would then make sure that the reaction only takes place if HCL is present. Prediction: The higher the concentration, the faster the reaction will occur. From background knowledge, it is known that a reaction will occur when particles collide, so the more particles there are the more collisions there will be. If there are more reactant particles per set volume higher concentration more collisions will occur per second, consequently, more particles reacting per second and the rate of reaction is increased. So for a lower concentration there will be less particles, so there will be less collisions therefore the reaction will be slower. Also the higher the concentration the more gas will be produced. This is because if there's more particles higher concentration reacting with the solid marble chips then the reaction will take place quicker. Consequently, the lower the concentration, the less particles to collide and start a reaction so less gas is produced. Equipment: · HCL · Water · Marble chips · Pessel and mortar · Stopwatch · Weighing scales correct to 2d.p. · Spatula · Water trough · Measuring cylinder x2 · Boiling tube with bung and pipe · Clamp stands x2 Method: To measure the rate of reaction, time how long it takes for the marble chips to react and measure the gas given off. To do this put a 100cm3 measuring cylinder in a water trough, with water inside it, held up by a clamp stand. Then put the pipe from the boiling tube under the measuring cylinder. The boiling tube with a pipe will be held by another clamp stand opposite the measuring cylinder. Crush the marble chips into powder with a pessel and mortar and measure out 0.5g of powder for each experiment with the weighing scales. Then, measure the amount of water and HCL needed with the second measuring cylinder. For each different concentration the exact same thing will be done. Put the HCL/Water solution into the boiling tube and make sure the pipe is under the measuring cylinder. After that pour the calcium carbonate powder into the solution, then start the stop clock and put the bung on the boiling tube the same time the calcium carbonate goes in. Then, every five seconds, measure how much gas has been produced using the scale on the measuring cylinder. Repeat the experiment three times for each different concentration and then take an average. Diagram: Chemistry for you page 190 This diagram is similar to the experiment conducted except a boiling tube held by a clamp stand with a pipe and bung was used instead of a flask. Fair test: · The marble chips are crushed to make sure the surface area is the same for each experiment because a larger surface area would take longer to react than a smaller one. So if all the chips are of the same surface area, then they will all react at the same speed, making it a fair test. · All the HCL will be of the same strength, as all experiments will use the same HCL from the same bottle. Stronger acid will speed up the rate of reaction. · The water and acid will be of the same temperature each time because temperature affects the rate of reaction. · After each experiment, the boiling tube will be cleaned properly to get rid of the acid and bits of Calcium carbonate so there's no extra acid or calcium carbonate in the next experiment. · The 100cm3 measuring cylinder will always be full to the top with water so that measurements will be fair. Safety: · To ensure that no acid gets into anyone's eyes, safety goggles will be worn. · Make other persons aware of harmful chemicals. HCL · Necessary medical equipment near by, e.g. eye wash. · Have a cloth or towel near by to clean up any spilt acid so it isn't hazardous to anyone around. Results: Amount of HCL cm3 Amount of water cm3 Gas produced every 5seconds cm3 Average 1st time 2nd time 3rd time 20 0 25 24 25 24.67 45 44 40 43.00 55 57 53 55.00 61 60 57 59.33 65 68 64 65.67 67 68 66 67.00 68 69 67 68.00 69 69 68 68.67 70 71 69 70.00 70 70 70 70.00 70 70 70 70.00 70 70 70 70.00 15 5 20 19 22 20.33 38 35 40 37.67 44 40 41 41.67 47 44 42 44.33 48 45 45 46.00 51 47 46 48.00 53 50 48 50.33 55 54 49 52.67 57 56 50 54.33 58 57 55 56.67 59 58 58 58.33 61 59 59 59.67 64 60 60 61.33 64 62 63 63.00 65 63 65 64.33 66 65 66 65.67 66 67 70 67.67 66 67 71 68.00 10 10 12 10 13 11.67 26 23 20 23.00 29 25 26 26.67 31 27 27 28.33 32 28 28 29.33 33 28 29 30.00 34 29 32 31.67 35 31 34 33.33 36 32 35 34.33 36 33 37 35.33 37 35 38 36.67 38 36 39 37.67 39 37 39 38.33 39 38 40 39.00 40 38 41 39.67 41 39 41 40.33 41 40 42 41.00 43 40 43 42.00 43 41 44 42.67 44 42 44 43.33 45 43 45 44.33 45 44 45 44.67 45 44 46 45.00 5 15 12 13 11 12.00 20 19 21 20.00 23 24 22 23.00 24 24 25 24.33 25 25 25 25.00 25 25 25 25.00 25 26 26 25.67 0 20 0 0 0 0 All results will be plotted on the same graph. This will then make it easier to analyze my results. The average amount of gas measured cm3 will be plotted against time seconds. Graph to show results: The graph was produced by hand and scanned into the word document. Analysis: All concentrations produced gas rapidly to begin with but the most rapid was the 100% concentration. This happened with all the different concentrations except they all started to increase with a steady rate at different times. 100% 30 seconds 75% 15 seconds 50% 10 seconds 25% 10 seconds From this we can see that the higher the concentration, the faster the reaction starts and the longer it continues rapidly. The graph indicates this in the linear gradient of the slope. As the reaction increases the gradient becomes steeper. This result supports the predictions made based on the collision theory. As there are more particles in a higher concentration, there are more collisions so the reaction is faster. When the graph became flat, it was shown that there was no more solid to react with the HCL saturation. The reactions all varied in how long the reaction took place for. 100% 60 seconds 75% 90 seconds 50% 115 seconds 25% 40 seconds The longest reaction was the 50% concentration. The graph shows this by the line leveling out for longer linear gradient. Although it was the longest reaction it didn't produce the most gas. It just produced gas very slowly as it was a low concentration, because there wasn't enough particles to react to make the reaction faster. So gas was produced but very slowly and not much of it. 100% concentration solution was over quickly again, shown by the line on the graph and produced a lot of gas; due to there being more particles to react with the solid marble chips. The 25% concentration however, took place over an even shorter time than the 100% concentration but a lot less gas was produced in the 25% concentration again, due to there not being many particles. The different concentrations also varied on how much gas was produced overall on average. 100% 70.00 cm3 75% 68.00 cm3 50% 45.00 cm3 25% 25.67 cm3 As predicted, the most gas was produced by the higher concentration and the least gas was produced by the lowest concentration. From the graph it can be seen that for different concentrations the amount of gas produced varies. This is due to there being more particles in a higher concentration to react with the solid marble chips. The results gained support the theory that the more concentration, the faster the reaction and the more gas is produced. This matches the predictions made. It is also seen that as the concentrations become less, gas is produced at a much slower, yet at a steady rate because of not having enough particles to react with the substance making the reaction slower. The conclusions and prediction are all based on the collision theory: All particles have to collide in order to react with one another. Evaluation: The method used for conducting the experiment was an effective one as: · It was easily done over the amount of time given in class to conduct the experiment. · It was simple and easy to repeat a lot of times to get enough results to calculate averages. · Produced sufficient results and were easy to present on a graph to compare. · It was a safe experiment. · It was an easy experiment to make sure everything was a fair test and accurate. If the investigation was to be done again, consideration may be given to repeating the test a few more times for each concentration to produce a better average. From the graph it can be seen that some of the concentrations don't level out. This is because for each concentration, each time the experiment was conducted; the gas stopped being produced at different times. So when the average was taken it didn't always show the gas had stopped being produced. So the graph doesn't always level off. Maybe if the gas produced every 5 seconds had been recorded more times, say 10 or 20, instead of 3, the graph would've leveled off. Another reason for this is maybe that the experiment wasn't left going for long enough and a few more bubbles of gas could've been recorded giving more accurate results. It is shown on the graph that the 50% concentration produced more than the 75% most probably because of the reason just mentioned. Even though the results weren't as accurate as they could've been for the reasons mentioned above, they still verified the predictions and conclusions made. Further experiments could be conducted to extend the work I have done. These could be to investigate the other variables in the same way I have conducted my experiment: · Surface area "“ different sizes of marble chips for each experiment. · Temperature of the acid "“ investigate a range of temperatures. · Catalysts "“ investigate the effect of a catalyst in an experiment. If then all these different factors were investigated, all the results could be put together to prove the conclusions further. Bibliography: Books: 1. Chemistry For You, National Curriculum Edition for GCSE "“ Lawrie Ryan Page 190 "“ diagram of experiment 2. Revision Guide for GCSE Double Science, Chemistry, Higher level "“ Richard Parsons Page 79 "“ diagrams to show how different variables affect the rate of reaction Page 80 "“ Graph to show the effect of a catalyst on the rate of reaction Websites: 1. 2.   

Aim: To investigate the rate of reaction between Hydrochloric acid and marble chips. Background Knowledge: Factors that affect the rate of reaction between hydrochloric acid and marble chips or any other reaction are called variables. They are: ¨ The surface area of the chips...

Words: 2875 View(s): 371 Comment(s): 0
For this investigation I am... For this investigation I am reacting magnesium ribbon Mg with Hydrochloric acid HCl I am measuring the rate of reaction between the two, and to do this am measuring the hydrogen given off by the reaction. Magnesium is a shiny silver coloured metal, an element with an atomic number of 12, which belongs to the group 2 alkali metal group; it therefore has only two orbiting electrons and is very unstable and reactive. Hydrochloric acid is a solution of hydrogen and chloride a colourless acidic gas in water, Hydrochloric Acid has a high acidity and therefore will react with an alkali metal, the magnesium will displace the hydrogen and bond with the chlorine giving off hydrogen gas and producing the salt magnesium chloride. To keep the experiment fair I must look at all the factors in the reaction, firstly the concentration of the hydrochloric acid is important because it determines how fast the reaction will happen, more HCl molecules in the hydrochloric acid solution will produce more collisions with the magnesium and dissolve it quicker this is the only variable which I am planning to vary, I will keep the different variations of acid in different containers to prevent contamination and will wash out containers before I use them too, the heat of the reaction will also determine how fast it takes place, more heat means more movement of molecules and more collisions between the HCl and the Mg particles, the amount of magnesium will also effect the reaction rate so I will use measured amounts that are all the same, and the surface area of the magnesium must be kept constant too because more surface area means more collisions and effects reaction speed, the apparatus used will be kept the same to give the reaction the same amount of room to take place in, keeping the equipment still which will reduce vibrations which in turn effect the reaction rate, the amount of hydrochloric acid used will be kept constant too because more HCl acid means more HCl molecules to collide with the magnesium, there is also the pressure at which the reaction takes place which will cause more reaction because the particles would be pushed closer together, although the gas given off would have to be measured at room pressure or the volume would be changed by the pressure, The issue of room temperature and the starting temperature of the solution will also be kept constant by keeping the acid bottles in a constant temperature and measuring the temperature at the beginning of the experiment to make sure that this temperature stays the same and therefore there will be a constant amount of activation energy and the reactions will start with the same amount of heat present and therefore will start at the same rate of reaction if no variables were changed. I am not planning to vary the pressure because it brings up to many complications and is not needed, I will start the stop watch as soon as the magnesium ribbon hits the acid and close the bung instantly, also to do this someone else will time for me while I handle the magnesium and close the bung up, I will also clean the jar in which the reaction was carried out to prevent inconsistencies in the strength of acid and possible side effects caused by residues left from the reaction. To carry out the experiment we will be using a conical flask which the reaction will take place in, a bung with tubes coming out of it for the gas to flow down, 4 small measuring cylinders to measure the amount of acid used the measuring cylinders measure in ml, which is equivalent to cm3 in a ration of 1:1 so we can use them to measure the volume of the gas, a margarine tub filled with water and a large measuring cylinder filled with water which will be put upside down in the water to measure gas produced by the reaction, varied strengths of hydrochloric Acid in 10ml quantities, Magnesium ribbon in4cm lengths, a stop watch to time the reaction, and safety goggles for protection from acid splashes. The hydrochloric acid will be put in the conical flask, the magnesium will be dropped in to start the reaction, the bung will be promptly placed on top of the conical flask, from the bung tubes run in to the margarine tub full of water and under the measuring tube so that when the reaction takes place gas will be pushed through the tube and collect in the measuring cylinder. There will be 4 variations of the acid strength, 2 molar, 1.5 molar, 1 molar, and 0.5 molar. I predict that the higher the concentration of the acid the quicker the reaction, but there will be a point where all the magnesium is depleted and the reaction rate will level out, some of the weaker concentrations will not reach that level, but some of the stronger ones should and there will be a point where there is no more magnesium to react and the gas is no longer produced. Before I did the actual experiments I tried some preliminary tests with some 1m acid and some 2m acid, the hydrogen was produced as soon as I dropped the magnesium ribbon in the acid, and the 2m acid reaction finished quicker than the 1m acid reaction, this determines that my original assumption was correct and the magnesium was dissolved quicker in the 2m acid, although both reactions produced the same amount of gas because I used the same amount of magnesium and therefore the reaction was limited to the amount of magnesium to react with, I tested the gas produced under a flame and it produced a high pitched squeak which indicated the presence of hydrogen and proves more of my hypothesis correct and I can determine that when the magnesium ribbon reacts with the hydrochloric acid, magnesium chloride is formed. Here is a graph to show my preliminary test results. Time 1m HCl 2m HCl 30 "“ 0:30 22 cm3 43 cm3 60 "“ 1:00 33 cm3 45 cm3 90 "“ 1:30 43 cm3 46 cm3 120 "“ 2:00 45 cm3 46 cm3 150 "“ 2:30 46 cm3 46 cm3 180 "“ 3:00 46 cm3 46 cm3 210 "“ 3:30 46 cm3 46 cm3 240 "“ 4:00 46 cm3 46 cm3 It would appear that the reaction levels out at the point where 46 cm3 of hydrogen gas is produced when using a 4cm long piece of magnesium. I wrote down the equation to show the reaction between the 2 reactents: Magnesium + Hydrochloric acid = Magnesium Chloride + Hydrogen Mgs + 2HClaq = MgClaq + Hg I will repeat each experiment 4 times to smooth out inconsistencies and be able to produce an average result. To ensure that the experiment is carried out safely I will wear protective goggles at all times when handling acid, stand up while doing experiments to get out of the way quickly in the case of acid spills, and keep a clear and tidy workspace around me to prevent things getting in the way and being damaged by acid. With the equipment set up I would drop the magnesium In to the acid, then begin timing for a set amount of time even if the reaction had finished, and measure the gas produced in the large measuring cylinder and note the volume every 30 seconds for 4 minutes. Here are my 4 results tables Time 0.5m HCl 1m HCl 1.5m HCl 2m HCl 30 "“ 0:30 7 cm3 23 cm3 39 cm3 43 cm3 60 "“ 1:00 12 cm3 34 cm3 42 cm3 45 cm3 90 "“ 1:30 19 cm3 42 cm3 45 cm3 47 cm3 120 "“ 2:00 26 cm3 46 cm3 47 cm3 47 cm3 150 "“ 2:30 30 cm3 46 cm3 47 cm3 47 cm3 180 "“ 3:00 34 cm3 46 cm3 47 cm3 47 cm3 210 "“ 3:30 37 cm3 46 cm3 47 cm3 47 cm3 240 "“ 4:00 39 cm3 46 cm3 47 cm3 47 cm3 Time 0.5m HCl 1m HCl 1.5m HCl 2m HCl 30 "“ 0:30 7 cm3 21 cm3 38 cm3 44 cm3 60 "“ 1:00 11 cm3 35 cm3 43 cm3 46 cm3 90 "“ 1:30 16 cm3 42 cm3 45 cm3 47 cm3 120 "“ 2:00 27 cm3 47 cm3 48 cm3 47 cm3 150 "“ 2:30 32 cm3 48 cm3 48 cm3 47 cm3 180 "“ 3:00 35 cm3 48 cm3 49 cm3 47 cm3 210 "“ 3:30 37 cm3 48 cm3 49 cm3 47 cm3 240 "“ 4:00 40 cm3 48 cm3 49 cm3 47 cm3 Time 0.5m HCl 1m HCl 1.5m HCl 2m HCl 30 "“ 0:30 6 cm3 20 cm3 38 cm3 44 cm3 60 "“ 1:00 12 cm3 33 cm3 43 cm3 47 cm3 90 "“ 1:30 17 cm3 43 cm3 46 cm3 48 cm3 120 "“ 2:00 26 cm3 48 cm3 49 cm3 48 cm3 150 "“ 2:30 29 cm3 49 cm3 49 cm3 48 cm3 180 "“ 3:00 34 cm3 49 cm3 49 cm3 48 cm3 210 "“ 3:30 36 cm3 49 cm3 49 cm3 48 cm3 240 "“ 4:00 39 cm3 49 cm3 49 cm3 48 cm3 Time 0.5m HCl 1m HCl 1.5m HCl 2m HCl 30 "“ 0:30 8 cm3 25 cm3 40 cm3 45 cm3 60 "“ 1:00 13 cm3 35 cm3 47 cm3 47 cm3 90 "“ 1:30 19 cm3 42 cm3 49 cm3 49 cm3 120 "“ 2:00 26 cm3 49 cm3 49 cm3 49 cm3 150 "“ 2:30 32 cm3 50 cm3 49 cm3 49 cm3 180 "“ 3:00 36 cm3 50 cm3 49 cm3 49 cm3 210 "“ 3:30 39 cm3 50 cm3 49 cm3 49 cm3 240 "“ 4:00 42 cm3 50 cm3 49 cm3 49 cm3 These are the 4 sets of results, I recoded 2 each lesson, the last results seem to be react slightly quicker than the others, this could be due to temperature of the room or contamination of the equipment, the reactions seem to have happened quicker, although they don't seem to be too random and I will use them in my average table set of results. Time 0.5mHCl 1mHCl 1.5mHCl 2mHCl 30 "“ 0:30 7 cm3 22.25 cm3 38.75 cm3 44 cm3 60 "“ 1:00 12 cm3 34.25 cm3 43.75 cm3 46.25 cm3 90 "“ 1:30 17.75 cm3 42.25 cm3 46.5 cm3 47.25 cm3 120 "“ 2:00 26.25 cm3 47.5 cm3 48.25 cm3 47.25 cm3 150 "“ 2:30 30.75 cm3 49 cm3 48.25 cm3 47.25 cm3 180 "“ 3:00 34.75 cm3 49 cm3 48.5 cm3 47.25 cm3 210 "“ 3:30 37.25 cm3 49 cm3 48.5 cm3 47.25 cm3 240 "“ 4:00 40 cm3 49 cm3 48.5 cm3 47.25 cm3 It was noticeable, when looking at the results table, that the more concentrated acid had a faster rate of reaction than the less concentrated acid. This was probably because there are more particles in a concentrated acid and therefore more collisions will occur, for example; the 0.5 molar acid reactions produced on average 7 cm3 of hydrogen gas in the first 30 seconds, whereas the 1.5 molar acid reactions produced on average 38.75 cm3 of hydrogen gas in the first 30 seconds. The results appear to level out at around about 48.4cm3; the concentration of the 0.5 acid reactions does not level out because we stopped the timer before the reaction had time to complete. I have made a graph of the average reaction rate for this experiment. The numbers along the bottom indicate time; the numbers along the side indicate cm3 of gas produced. The graph supports my original prediction, it shows that the higher the concentration of the acid in molars the faster the reaction occurs and hydrogen is produced quicker, therefore I can deduce that In a higher concentration there are more acid particles to react with the magnesium ribbon and therefore it is dissolved faster. Therefore if you increase the concentration of the acid you are introducing more particles into the reaction which will in turn produce a faster reaction because there will be more collisions between the particles which is what increases the reaction rate. If we would have carried on the practical for a longer time the 0.5 molar reactions would have eventually levelled out at about 48.4cm3. While performing the experiment I had to ensure that the temperature was kept constant throughout, because varying temeperature will vary the results, if the temperature increases from the start time to the finish time then the reaction speeds will get quicker at a slightly greater rate, there was also the issue of room temperature which we measured but could not do much about because the room is a large environment and has many sources of heat. The reaction could have been sped up or slowed down in many ways but the amount of hydrogen produced remains constant. There are always ways to improve an experiment like this, I could have measured the temperature of the acid to make sure that it all started at the same temperature, and could have recorded temperature results while doing the practical too, so that I have 2 sets of results for each experiment, and could compare these and analyse how they are relevant to the experiment. Also the measuring of the acid could have been improved using small measuring syringes, and the measuring of the hydrogen produced could also be improved using the gas measuring syringe which would have produced much more accurate results because getting the upturned measuring cylinder in water without letting air in was difficult and the reading of the measuring cylinder could have been improved using the gas measuring syringe because the results would have been more accurate. Also weighing the magnesium ribbon, and cutting it more precisely would have helped get more accurate results, the magnesium was also covered in a white powder, some pieces more so than others, this is magnesium oxide, produced where the magnesium has been exposed to air, the pieces with more magnesium oxide on them would have less magnesium to react with the acid and the oxide may slow the reaction by getting in the way, or reacting with the acid and producing water. I could have cleaned each piece of magnesium with some emery cloth to reduce the magnesium oxide. I could have also tried varying other constants in my experiment, beginning of the year I temperature, the presence of a catalyst, the surface area of the magnesium or the pressure of the reaction chamber. These differentials in the variables would affect the reaction rates in different ways, but the tests all followed the same predicted pattern and shows that there is a level where all the magnesium is depleted, if we had used more magnesium and less hydrochloric acid we could have found a point where the amount of hydrochloric acid levels out before the magnesium, but we would have to use a lot of magnesium because using a small amount of hydrochloric acid would make it much harder to measure the results with current equipment. I also did some extra tests using 3 cm pieces of magnesium, and measuring how much gas was produced, to do these measurements we used the same equipment apart from the measuring cylinder which was replaced with the gas measuring syringe, the measuring syringe was much more accurate than the cylinder, and gave us better readings. The amount of gas produced from the 3cm piece of magnesium levels out at a point of 32 cm3 if we put this in a line graph with the maximum amount of hydrogen produced from the 5.5 cm pieces of magnesium we can predict how much the most amount of hydrogen that can be produced by a reaction between a different length of magnesium with hydrochloric acid. Here is a graph of the readings I got using the 4 cm piece of magnesium. Time 0.5m 1m 1.5m 2m 30 - 0:30 8 12 27 29 60 - 1:00 12 17 33 31 90 - 1:30 17 25 34 31 120 - 2:00 19 28 34 31 150 - 2:30 23 33 34 31 180 - 3:00 26 35 34 31 210 - 3:30 28 35 34 31 240 - 4:00 30 34 34 31 the results are much more varied in these tests, this could be due to greater accuracy and being able to note these variances, or from some sort of contaminant, the average amount of gas produced for a 5.5 cm piece of magnesium was 48.4 cm3 the average amount of gas produced for a 3 cm piece of magnesium was 42 cm3 the more magnesium means there are more magnesium atoms to react with the hydrochloric acid molecules and therefore more hydrogen is produced, if we put these in to a line graph we can use it to estimate how much hydrogen would be produced by other lengths of magnesium. I have drawn a line of best fit between the two points, with this graph we can estimate how much hydrogen would be produced if we reacted 1cm of magnesium. The graph gives a reading of around about 18 cm3 of hydrogen gas produced, if I had extra time we could test this theory, but unfortunately we do not. I also only did one set of results for the tests with the gas syringe, if I would have been able to continue this experiment further I could have produced more average results and seen if my predictions for the 1 cm piece of magnesium was correct. We could have also varied the concentration of the acid more so, and used less or more acid to get more accurate results or results for different test situations, instead of changing the strength we could have changed the amount of acid, or the temperature of the acid, or try varying these together and see how they effect each other.   

For this investigation I am reacting magnesium ribbon Mg with Hydrochloric acid HCl I am measuring the rate of reaction between the two, and to do this am measuring the hydrogen given off by the reaction. Magnesium is a shiny silver coloured metal, an element with an atomic...

Words: 3186 View(s): 607 Comment(s): 0
Introduction In this... Introduction In this assignment I will investigate hazard and prevention. This is three tasks assignment. In task one I will make a checklist and definition of checklist and why we should make a checklist for any place. For task two I have given an A4 sheet with tropical image of accidents. For this task I need to find out these accidents and write how I could prevent them. Fro task three I need to write all about hazards and anything related to this. Task one In this task I am going to make a checklist for my chemistry lab. Checklist is a tool to ensure all-important steps or actions in an operation have been taken. Checklist contains items important or relevant to an issue or situation. Checklist is a safety list. Checklist is a list of different equipment in a lab or home or office. Make sure that all the equipment listed in the checklist and it should check once or twice a year. A checklist helps us to find out what type of equipment we get a specific place, such as lab or home. If I don¡¦t have a checklist, than I can¡¦t tell what I have gets in a place such as lab or home. Checklist often confused with check sheet. Check sheet is a simple data-recording device. The check sheet is custom designed by the user, which allow him or her to readily interpret the result. I am going to make a checklist about G4 Chemistry laboratory. I will check each item once a year. Category Date of checking Any thing wrong Yes No Action Job Done First Aid Eye wash 20 /08/2002 Water line block Call an plumber Clear the line. Fire fighting Equipment Fire Extinguisher Fire Blanket Fire Alarm Fire Exit Sand Bucket Main Equipment Gas guard Electric power supply Gas tapes Electric sockets Equipment Broken bucket Bin bag Water bath Oven Special equipment Distilled water Eye/body protection Lab coat Goggle Spectacles Face shield Experiment safety Hazards warning sign Safety screen Task two a I have given an A4 sheet paper where they gave me a typical image of an accident waiting to happen in the laboratory. My task is to identify these accidents and explain how I could prevent them happening. List of the accident may happen in this laboratory: 1. A boy doing an experiment where chemicals will fall of on his body. And he didn¡¦t wear an eye protection. And height of the object is not appropriate for him. 2. A girl doing en experiment but her long hears were untied, under her hair there is a Bunsen burner with fire. 3. Middle of the class room there is water on the floor. 4. A boy opens an electric socket without teacher permission. He might get electric shock. 5. All students do not wear eye protection. 6. A girl playing with the rubber band and disturbing other to do their experiment. 7. A girl doing experiment but her test tube face at her chemicals will go on to her body. 8. A girl doing an experiment but her test tube faced straight to up. Hot chemicals may explore and fall on to her body. 9. A girl holding a hot bicker without a glove. 10. A girl looking to other girl and mistakenly she put her hand up on the hot gorse. 11. A boy carrying box but he can¡¦t see anything what happen to front. 12. Main exit door blocked by boxes. If fire in the room no one can get out. 13. Teacher given demonstration about chemical where students were too close and there is no safety screen. None of these students wearing goggle. 14. A girl put an iron stand at the edge of the tale. It could fall onto someone¡¦s foot. 15. Some one put a biker up on the gorse at the edge of the table. 16. Bunsen burner left with blue fire. I could prevent these accidents by: 1. Height of the object must be appropriate for him. And he must wear a goggle to do chemical experiment. 2. This girl must tie her hear up and when she does not use Bunsen burner she must left it with yellow coloured fire. 3. Clean the water as soon as possible. Otherwise someone may slip n the floor. And it may break their leg or hip. 4. Teacher must warn students about electric socket that students never try to open an electric socket. It is dangerous to get an electric shock. 5. All students doing various experiments, but none of them use eye protection. Chemicals or other thing could spill in to the eye. To prevent this happen teacher must tell students advantage of wearing a goggle which can save my eyes to have any damages. 6. Tell her play outside. 7. Test tube must not face to you or other people, because chemical may explore and go onto your body. 8. Test tube must put diagonally, because if test tube put straight up and chemicals heated than chemical will explore and could fall onto your body. 9. If anyone needs to hold some thing hot they must use glove. Because otherwise they might burn themselves. 10. If anyone does any experiment they must concentrate with their experiment. 11. Tell him to remove these boxes after the class. 12. Clear the door way. 13. Use a safety screen and student must wear goggle. 14. Put the iron stand middle of the table. 15. Put bicker and gorse middle on the table. 16. Bunsen burner must be left with yellow flame. Task two b In this task I will write about three accident and necessary emergency procedures could be used in these accident. There are the accidents: ƒ¾ Chemical in the eye ƒ¾ Chemical burn ƒ¾ Electric shock Chemical in the eye: splashes of chemicals in the eye can cause serious injury if not treated quickly. Recognition of chemicals there may be: "žÃ Intense pain in the eye "žÃ Inability to open the injured eye "žÃ Redness and swelling around the eye "žÃ Copious watering of the eye "žÃ Evidence of chemical substance or containers in the immediate area. Treatment: First thing do not allow the casualty to touch the injured eye or forcibly remove contact lens. Hold the affected eye under gently running cold water for at least ten minutes. Make sure that you irrigate both sides of the eyelid thoroughly. If the eye is shut in a spasm of pain, gently but firmly pull the eyelid open. Be careful that contaminate/rotten water does not splash the uninjured eye. Ask the casualty to hold sterile eye pad or any clean pad or non-fluffy materials over the injured eye. Than take or send the casualty to the hospital. Chemical burn: certain chemicals may irritate, harm or be absorbed through the skin, causing widespread and some times fatal damage. Recognition of chemical there may be: "žÃ Evidence of chemical in the vicinity "žÃ Intense, stinging pain "žÃ Later, discolouration and swelling of the affected area. Treatment: Never attempt to neutralise acid or alkali burn unless trained to do so. Do not delay starting treatment by searching for an ambulance. First make sure that injured area is safe. Ventilate the area and remove the casualty if necessary. And seal the chemical container if possible. Flood the affected area with water to disperse the chemical and stop the burning. Do this at least 20 minutes. Gently remove the pollute clothing during flooding the injury. Take or sand the casualty to hospital. Give the details about chemical to medical person. Electric shock: Domestic current, as used in home, office, college lab etc, can caused serious injury and even death. Action: do not touch the casualty if they contact with electrical current, he will be ¡§live¡¨ and risk electrocution. Do no use anything metallic to push away the electrical source. Try to switch off the socket or main power, if you can¡¦t switch off than stand on dry insulating materials such as a wooden box or telephone guide. Push the casualty¡¦s limbs away from the source with a broom, wooden chair or stool or push the push the source from the casualty, whichever is easier. If the casualty is unconscious, open the airway check for breathing and be ready to place them in recovery position. Cool if there any burn with cold water. Dial 999 for an ambulance. If the casualty seems to be unharmed, advise them to rest. Observe them closely and, if in doubt, call a doctor. If the hart stops apply the ABC Airway, Breathing and Circulation signs of life of resuscitation until a normal heartbeat returns or specific medical treatment is given. Task three Hazard & Risk The term "risk" is often confused with "hazard". A high voltage power supply, a sample of radioactive metal, or a toxic chemical may present a hazard, meaning that they present the potential for harm. Concentrated acids, for example, clearly present the hazard to the user of serious burns if they are handled incorrectly. A hazard is something with the potential to cause harm of life e.g. this can be a substance, part of a machine, form of energy, method of work or a situation. Harm includes death, injury, physical or mental ill health, damage to property, loss of production, damage to the environment or any combination of these. Risk is a measure of the likelihood that the harm from a particular hazard will occur, taking into account the possible severity of the harm. The risk is the probability or chance that the hazard posed by the chemical will lead to injury. Thus, concentrated sulphuric acid is a hazardous chemical; because it is very corrosive and reactive. However, provided it is handled in an appropriate way the risks it poses may be small. For the risk to be real: "žÃ The threat must exist. "žÃ There is likely to be magnitude of effect. "žÃ There is potential for occurrence. It is thus evident that hazards are something we can do little about. The hazard posed by a carcinogen, a concentrated acid or an explosive substance is inherent properties of the material. The risks they pose, however, can be and should be! minimised by initially preparing a suitable risk assessment. Risk Assessment is the process of analysing the level of risk, considering those in danger, and evaluating whether hazards are adequately controlled, taking into account any measures already in place and any work practices that may be in force. I have to fill a risk assessment for my Physics experiment. Sample of that risk assessment form as below: Components of Hazards There are number of components to consider in defining hazard: ľ Intrinsic properties of the hazard. ľ The nature of the equipment or from of the material such as vapour, mist, liquid etc. ľ The exposure-effect relationship. ľ The pathways and frequency of use ľ Aspects of worker behaviour the affect exposure to the hazard. ľ Mechanisms of action. Type of Hazards: There are different types of hazards: Chemical hazard: through a variety of action, chemicals can cause damage to health and property. Some of these actions are explosive, flammable, corrosive, oxidation, poisoning, toxicity, and carcinogenicity. Biological Hazard: mainly from infection or allergic reaction. Biological hazards include viruses, bacteria, fungi and other organism. Some biological hazards such as AIDS or hepatitis B are potentially life threatening. Physical hazards: these include noise, radiation such as ionising, electromagnetic or non-ionising, heat, cold, vibration and pressure. Ergonomic hazards, psychological hazards, Lateral water hazards, EM hazards, health hazards etc. Components of Risk; ľ Individual variation in susceptibility. ľ The numbers exposed. ľ The degree of individual risk. ľ The possibility of elimination of a less hazardous substance or process. ľ The possibility of achieving of the hazard. ľ Public opinion and pressure groups. ľ Social responsibility. Perception of Risk: People judge risks differently. Judgments are made on the ease of recall and imagining. For example, the role of the media in bringing risk issues such as AIDS or asbestos to public attention in one exercise of this judgment. While risk analyses will provide some estimate of a risk in numerical terms, presentation of quantitative facts on risk rates often does not work well. Statistical expressions of risk are only one dimension of risk, and these may be irrelevant to lay people who view risk qualitatively. Warning signs represent a hazard level between Caution and Danger. A warning indicates a potentially hazardous situation, which, if not avoided, could result in death or serious injury. All the chemicals in the laboratory must have warning sign and labelled, because without a warning sign or label no one will know is it a corrosive, flammable or other dangerous chemical. To be safe in a laboratory than all chemical must be label and must have a warning sign. Example of some warning sign: A survey carried out in school science laboratory publisher in education in science. The result of that survey most common accident in the laboratory as below: Accident Percentage Chemicals in the eye 23% Chemicals on the body 21% Cuts 20% Burn & scalds 15% Dropping, falling, slipping, lifting, knocking 7% Chemicals in mouth 4% Inhalation 4% Animal bites 3% Explosions 2% Electric shock 1% Most common accidents in laboratory show in the pie chart as below; The result of the survey tell that chemical in the, is the most common, because students does not follow the safety rule. In the safety rule they give everything what student should do when they enter in a laboratory. Before get this result I thought cut will be the height common accident, but in this result show chemical in the eye is the most common accident. This because students don¡¦t understand the important of wear eye protection. They didn¡¦t listen to their teacher. The safest place from accident is science laboratory, because they have rule which you must need to follow. And mostly accident happened in home, because we don¡¦t have any rule in home. That way in the home there are most accident happened. For safe in laboratory they made a safety rule. A sample of a safety rule in science laboratory is below: To be safe in the laboratory we must follow the safety rules and we must have hazards warning sign and label. And minimise the risk we should do risk assessment. Before using a lab first thing to do is make a checklist of the entire item in the lab. Than check these once or twice a year. Safety check is very important because if something wrong in the lab than from safety check we could know about it. Safety check helps us to find out any fault or any thing change we need to do. In your home you also need a checklist, because if any thing stolen from your home police will ask you what the things stolen. In this time you need a checklist. You also need checklist for checking is your all machinery or other things work properly such as your washing machine, freezer etc. so a checklist very important for any particular place.   

Introduction In this assignment I will investigate hazard and prevention. This is three tasks assignment. In task one I will make a checklist and definition of checklist and why we should make a checklist for any place. For task two I have given an A4 sheet with...

Words: 2760 View(s): 199 Comment(s): 0