Related Keywords

No Related Keywords

Register NowHow It Works Need Essay Need Essay
Carol Ann Duffy coursework
0 User(s) Rated!
Words: 706 Views: 405 Comments: 0
Carol Ann Duffy writes poetry, which reveal disturbing aspects of human behaviour and the human nature. I will be writing about these three poems, 'Salome', 'Before you were mine', and 'Stealing'. I will be going into deeper meanings with these poems showing what is revealed and how it is revealed. Te three poems all have more than one theme. In Salome, the theme is revenge, and it also has a strong sexual element. The main idea in the text of before you were mine is a sexual element, but one between the mother and daughter which is very disturbing....
men.

In my opinion the speaker speaks quite estuary language, for example, "flogged it", "bust of Shakespeare", "booze and fags", "beater or blighter", and "ma". These are all slang terms from the three poems, and show the speaker is speaking of quite a low-average register of language. By the speaker's socialect, we can tell that she could be from a working class or middle class background.

To conclude, I think the poems are well structured, have much deeper meanings than most people realise, and that they do go into the morally wrong aspects of human nature.

Become A Member Become a member to continue reading this essay orLoginLogin
View Comments Add Comment

Arthur Miller was born on... Arthur Miller was born on October 17th, 1915, in New York City. His parents were both immigrants into the United States. The family lived in prosperity due to the success of his father"s clothing manufacturing business, but this soon collapsed along with the American economy as a whole. Miller worked as a warehouse man in order to save up fees so that he was able to attend Michigan University in 1934 to study Economics and History alongside a course of play writing. Miller wrote in the style of Greek tragedy. Miller chose to follow the Greek myths as in his play he had two acts. In the first act the finding of the problem is viewed and in the second act the possible outcomes are predicted. In Greek tragedy there is always a "chorus", a voice which fills in what does not happen on stage; Alfieri was the chorus as he narrated the play. Miller chose Eddie to die as all along in the play Alfieri gave speeches about tragic events about to happen. Alfieri had predicted eddies destiny to be hurtful and eddies ending was death. In Greek tragedy the hero is usually responsible for their own downfall. Eddie chose to ignore Alfieri"s advice and Eddie chose to fight with Marco. Eddie causes his own downfall by preventing Rodolfo and Catherine"s marriage. The play is set in the shadow of Brooklyn Bridge and is about a whole community not only the Carbone family. Miller"s personal and political views are revealed with great clarity and considering the background to "A View from the Bridge" all his thoughts unravel into sharp focus. In this play tragedy is conveyed in several different forms. Many of them disrupting and deceiving. The sense of tragedy conveyed in this play:- envy, love, death, tension, frustration, folk lore, guilt, law,guilt, trust, tradition, culture, betrayal, denial, jealousy, hatred and protectiveness. A view, two links, Alfieri the lawyer has an overview of the whole play. He is aware of the wrongs and rights involved. As he narrates and takes us through the play, he reveals the life of illegal immigrants as they take a new step of life into America. Coming from a Sicilian background they have crossed many bridges i.e. culture, tradition, relationships, folk lore and love. Already Miller has showed us that his parents have crossed these bridges. The question is where to? Reading the play I felt that the main character on the bridge and not knowing which way to turn was Beatrice. She knew that her husband Eddie was in love with her niece Catherine, and Catherine was in love with Rodolpho one of the illegal immigrants. She is on this bridge as there are two endings possible in this huge cliché. Rodolpho a young attractive man with light blond hair or Catherine has a choice of Eddie an old overweight weak man. All along Catherine is has dealt with Edie being overprotective naïve and unfair. The bridge also represents old life and new life. Eddie"s life ends in death as he chose the wrong path. All along he feels that he has the right over Catherine where according to her and the law he does not. His wise and fair lawyer and friend advices him on adapting to the American law and Italian culture; that Catherine has the choice who she will marry and as a husband already even thinking like this was going towards the opposite side of the bridge. Catherine has the choice and chooses to cross the bridge to a brighter future with someone she loves trusts and with whom she can have a wider variety of opportunities and chances. When Alfieri has a personalized conversation with Eddie, he is not only advising him as a friend but through the legal system as well. Eddie was very angry and devastated when he realized that Catherine loved Rodolpho and not him. The hidden love he had for Catherine soon turned into obsessivenes and anger over her freedom. Alfieri states that Eddie "was a good man". It shows that Alfieri understood how Eddie was feeling; his emotions and that Eddie"s thoughts were not functioning in a responsible way. Alfieri introduces himself by saying "to meet a lawyer or a priest on the street is unlucky". This comment came across as negative to me because the use of the word "unlucky". Usually a priest or lawyers are looked up at as means of purity and help. In this case it is bad and negative because the society prefers to run their lives in the way they were brought up, not changing to the American and modern way of life. "¢ "This ones name was Eddie Carbone, a long shore man working at the dock from Brooklyn bridge"¦"¦"¦" "¢ "he was a good man as he had to be in a life that was hard and even" These two comments both have the word "was" in them. They caught my attention as it presumed that the man Alfieri is talking about was alive and is no more in the present or about the past. He knows that Eddie has very little time until a big and major tragedy occurs. He knows that Eddie"s struggles and hard working will end in tragedy. From the beginning Alfieri has a situation and an ending in his head, almost as if he knew all along. Intelligently he tries to warn Eddie through his job and as a close friend. He is aware of the trouble Eddie has and is willing to help him but Eddie"s emotions are uncontrollable," This is my last word, take it or not, that's your business. Morally and legally you have no rights, you cannot stop it; she is a free agent". As Alfieri makes his speeches through the play he gives the reader a deeper insight of what is going on. He explores by going deeper into the story and looks from above on the whole community like his 'view is from a bridge'. Living in Brooklyn and being from a different cultural background and trying to carry on traditions were normal for illegal and legal migrants. In America they could find jobs and homes that would allow them to lead a successful life. The Carbone family was focused on and one thing that was highly present was the concept of respect. In the play Catherine a young girl is provoked by her uncle Eddie who has constantly overlooked her. "you ain"t goin" nowheres" "Eddie, I"m not gonna be a baby any more! You-" Eddie as usual feels that he has the right to stop Catherine from leaving the house. For the first time she stands up to him and he feels a big shock and he is astonished. As it around Christmas time he has had a few drinks and feels tipsy. Miller uses the Christmas theme as it fits in well with the situation. Eddie as the head of the house and family is highly respected. When him and his wife agree to bring in two men from their homeland, a new beginning and end are foreseen here. Catherine"s relationship develops with Rodolfo one of the immigrants, and leads to them wanting to marry. Eddie is distraught and completely disagrees with it. Tunnels are dark and gloomy. When Eddie went to Alfieri, Alfieri sensed his pain and anger, "But I will never forget how dark the room became when he looked at me; his eyes were like tunnels". Being in a tunnel is dark , cold , wet and not sure what you will find , it also leaves you with a sense of not knowing were the tunnel will end. Alfieri was aware of Eddie"s love for Catherine. Alfieri compares Eddie"s eyes with a tunnel as he saw a certain dull and gloomy ending. When Eddie is in trouble he visits Alfieri. Here the conversation proceeds to Alfieri furiously advising Eddie "You have no recourse in the law, Eddie", "There is nothing you can do Eddie, believe me" .Alfieri wants to assist Eddie but as far as the law goes there"s nothing he can do. He can tries to make Eddie believe him. Eddie feels that Catherine is being stolen away from him; he has not realized that Catherine is now a woman. Alfieri sums up his advice by simply telling Eddie "let her go". He complies this in such a way that Eddie knows Alfieri is right but his emotions once again overcome his thinking. "His eyes were like tunnels, my first thought was that he had committed a crime ", stating his thoughts carefully Alfieri shows us the readers that eddies image was pain full. Alfieri felt that he could help, he could see through him, he knew Eddie was going to do wrong he just wanted to help. Further on in the play Alfieri speaks of a mans routine, "a man works, raises his family, goes bowling, eats, gets old and then dies". This sounds tragic, but reading the play I realized that Miller"s use of language is toning and descriptive. Eddie Carbone spent his days, in this manor. Through out the play Alfieri conveys his thoughts which lead to predictions which are precisely accurate. Destiny plays a huge part in this play. At the beginning and end Alfieri makes powerful speeches. He focus"s on the Carbone Family, and through his speeches predicts what will happen in the future. He predicts that Eddies destiny is death an unhappy, dangerous and cruel death. Marco the brother of Rodolpho feels that Eddie has stole from his family and mocked his world. Miller chooses to make Marco angry as Marco was usually the quite one and never complained even when he saw the way Rodolpho was being treated. "He degraded my brother. My blood. He robbed my children, he mocks my work. I work to come here mister!" The tragedy in this is that Marco is heart broken over the disappointment brought to his blood and family. At the opening of the play Alfieri talks about the odds of being a lawyer in America, in a community of Sicilians "behind that suspicious little nod of theirs lie three thousand years of distrust .A lawyer means law, and in Sicily, from where their fathers came, the law has not been a friendly idea"¦." This point of his speech suggested that Sicilian culture and tradition plays a major part in the community. Its shows that what the parents did not and said had an effect on the upbringing of the child, it stays with the person as an honor and discipline. The last t paragraph hit my thoughts with a huge impact. "Now we settle for half". Half is the midpoint of a whole. Eddie could not gain what he wanted to happen fully but he thought by doing what he did he would have achieved something. Alfieri knew that Eddie"s feelings were immense and had warned Eddie to keep them in control. "His death useless" His death had no moral meaning behind it. It was an accident waiting to happen. "He allowed himself to be wholly known and for that I will love him" Alfieri living and working in the community new that Eddie was an open man with everyone. The only thing he hid was his feelings. Miller chooses to let Alfieri give this speech as he as a narrator and lawyer knew both his problems lawfully and morally.   

Arthur Miller was born on October 17th, 1915, in New York City. His parents were both immigrants into the United States. The family lived in prosperity due to the success of his father"s clothing manufacturing business, but this soon collapsed along with the American economy as a whole. Miller...

Words: 1924 View(s): 277 Comment(s): 0
The play begins in Italy... The play begins in Italy with an ancient feud between two families. We know this because the prologue says, "From ancient grudge" The quarrelling is between the two families the Montagues and the Capulets. The prologue does not state what the argument is about but we do know it has also been going on for years. I think that there are several causes of violence amongst the Montagues and the Capulates. One of the causes is Tybalt "Prince of cats", the older generation are encouraging and fuelling the argument as well as financing the war. Maybe it is just the younger generation who are bored and immature with not a lot else to do expect fight each other as they were brought up to do so. Or does Mercutio share the blame along with Tybalt for being the main perpetrators of violence and encouraging others to do so? There could quite possibly be role models for the other Capulets and Montagues and a good source of inspiration. I'm now going to discuss Tybalt and Mercutio their excitability and their anger. Tybalt is aggressive and has a very short temper, and knows little of how to control it and is always spoiling for a fight. For example in the Capulet's house party : "Tybalt: This, by his voice, should be a Montague fetch me my rapier boy." Act 1 scene 5 This is very often his way of anger thinking and he will do anything to have a fight with anyone. Another example of his anger and aggressiveness would be when he is talking to the Montagues in Act 1 Scene 1, when he says he hates peace which means he must want chaos. "Tybalt: What drawn and talk of peace? I hate the word. And I hate hell, all Montague's, and thee." Act 1 Scene 1 He say this to the crowd of Montague's. It sounds like he is very influenced by the older generation. Mercutio is Tybalt's equivalent in the clan . He does provoke him and he does know that Tybalt has a short fuse: "Mercutio: I will not budge for no man's pleasure, I." This is said in an aggressive way to try and provoke Tybalt. Mercutio also does really enjoy letting his mouth run away and says what is on his mind. His mouth is almost as an affective weapon as a sword, with short sharp insults "you rat catcher, will you walk?" so he challenges with an insult. I sometime get the feeling in various course of the play he is a bit bitter about love and we may be correct in speculating that he has had his heart broken by a girl in the past. I think that the older generation are most to blame for what goes on. Because although they can not do any fighting themselves as they are reminded by their wives : "Lady Capulet: A crutch, a crutch! Why call you for a sword." Act 1 Scene 1 However the older generation influence the younger generation a lot. They have brought them up and taught them to hate the other family. As the story takes place around mainly young men they have not yet made up their own mind. It is like they are almost slaves to the older generation. I think it is unfair to try and pass blame of violence onto young men in generally because not all young men are like this as is shown by Benvolio as he tried to break up the fight in Act1 Scene 1 "Part, fool"¦ " and also in Act 3 scene 1: "Benvolio: we talk here in the public haunt of men: Either withdraw unto some private place, Or reason coldly of your grievances, Or else depart; here all eyes gaze on us." So this generally statement is not true for all young men as some are peacefully. However though some are not. This also proves he that he is not comfortable with violence and generally wants peace. The prince also puts a great deal of trust in him because he always seems to tell the truth: "Benvolio: O noble prince, I can discover all The unlucky manage of this fatal brawl There lies the man, slain by young Romeo That slew thy kingsman, brave Mercutio." Act 3 scene 1 This is Benvolio either being honest or being a grass and trying to wriggle out of any punishment that may be brought on his fellow comrades. My opinion is that he is just being honest and trying to be peaceful and admitting to this tragedy of death. Gregory and Sampson do like to causing trouble almost as if to impress the older generation or to impress Romeo and Mercutio. But amongst themselves it sounds like they have a lot of hate inside with no good reason, such as they like to discuss the raping of women: "Sampson:"¦"¦.. I will take The wall of any man or maid of the Montague's" Act 1 Scene 1 In other words they want to rape the women against the wall or kill the men against the wall. This talk about sex fuels violence and makes them even more so that bit aggressive. I think the older generation are most to blame for the violence because of their influence on the young men. The young men are a lot more easily influenced than young women and it is mainly then men that have the quarrel with each other. Tybalt is also to blame for the violence in Verona as he provokes Romeo a lot of the time. However as Romeo is all romantic he has no real interest in fighting and does his best to shrug it off.  

The play begins in Italy with an ancient feud between two families. We know this because the prologue says, "From ancient grudge" The quarrelling is between the two families the Montagues and the Capulets. The prologue does not state what the argument is about but we do know it...

Words: 988 View(s): 219 Comment(s): 0