Is Shakespeare's original description of Romeo and Juliet as being "a pair of star crossed lovers" an adequate explanation for their final tragedy? Shakespeare's description of Romeo and Juliet as being 'a pair of star crossed lovers' implies that it was pre-determined before their birth that they would fall in love with each other and commit suicide. This idea of fate is not an adequate description of Romeo and Juliet's final tragedy. This only partially explains the tragedy; the factor's, which adequately describe the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, include the, involvement of the Friar, the volatility of Tybalt and...
when Romeo and Juliet were dead they immediately forgave and forgot, this didn't have to happen, because a feud that was going on for that long should have been stopped before it went that far.

The Tragedy Romeo and Juliet was largely the Friars involvement and not thinking in the best interest of Romeo and Juliet. The families feud affected the decisions of Romeo and Juliet , and Tybalt volatility and vengefulness towards the Montague's. Fate could not be the description of their final tragedy, because of all the other factors which had a greater contribution to the tragedy.