Edward is described as a firm and fair king, maybe biased towards him, the source is being truthful but using the wording to make him sound not as bad as he is. For example, the source 3.1 describes him, and say's that "if some cause aroused his anger, he seemed as terrible as a lion, but never revealed his anger by railing" here it is saying that he could be mean, harsh and terrible when angry, but is trying to justify it, and make things look better for him, but without lying. Source 3.1 is primary evidence, and was...
and power.

Unfortunately the next king of England did not live up to his predecessors standards, and was greedy, and corrupt, and the councils followed his every word, out of greed, and probably fear of disobeying him to, meaning he was free to do as he pleased with the country, and he did. Taxes were imposed, and military service too, and living standards dropped after all that had improved.

There is not as much information on William II as William I, but it is apparent that he was not as good a king as William I.